this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
NBA - Main
14 readers
5 users here now
Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If anything it shows that the Kings are definitely worse than those teams that beat them. It’s one thing to lose to a team that got hot or did something that the coaches weren’t prepared for. It’s another thing to have experience with a team, and then have them prove that they are better than you by beating you again
So then does this mean that if the kings beat the wolves again, they are also worse than the warriors, pelicans, and rockets?
No. That means the Kings are better than the Wolves. This isn’t your rpg games it’s not a flat level, different matchups mean different teams are better than different teams
If Kings beat the Wolves again, that means Kings are better than the Wolves due to the matchup. Just like Kings are worse than the Rockets, Pelicans, and Warriors due to matchup. Why would you possibly think this stat is a good stat for the Kings?
I don’t. It’s a meaningless stat. I just think it’s dumb to draw such big conclusions from losing to a team twice. Especially when we were missing deaaron fox in 3 of those losses. Btw - go wolves. I’m from MN originally and they’re my second team.