this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

12 readers
1 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
communick@nba.space
1
It’s weird for me that Lillard is considered Top 75 but Manu is not. (alien.top)
submitted 9 months ago by Fr0_oz3n@alien.top to c/nba@nba.space
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Anyone who grew up watching Manu knows what I’m talking about. The guy was a baller. Arguably the greatest sixth man in NBA history. But this is probably where the biggest departure is from Lillard; Manu didn’t have the same green light.

Dame averages 25 6 playing 36 min a night. Manu 13 4 playing around 25 minutes.

But Manu’s 4 rings and the impact he had on those chip years was insane. I still remember him outplaying Wade in the finals. The guy had some GREAT moments in his career.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IHateYouKids@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

By choice and strategy. He'd have started and excelled on any team

[–] Shot-Swordfish-5208@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

We can't just assume that his body would have held up or even his production when schemed for as the main guy. People use the same arguments against guys like Klay.