this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1468 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
2982 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

All MS software should be considered spyware.

It's just a shame that Outlook doesn't really have an alternative with the same level of functionality (not without spending a while adding on a bunch of add-ons anyway), and many workplaces (including mine) enforce use of Outlook and other MS software.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly don't mind when workplaces enforce X or Y. It's not like any of my personal stuff goes on the work equipment anyway, nor is work stuff going on my personal equipment.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fair enough. Unfortunately some bosses force staff to have Outlook and/or Teams on their personal phones as well. I hate it.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

depend in what country you work, i can't answer for you, but for me(brasil) is literally against the law

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That's good. Everywhere should be like that!

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yea, you want shit on my phone? Give me a work phone.

As an enterprise IT geek of 30 years, having work stuff on personal devices is a hard no, unless you're doing a managed containerized setup like decent MDM does.

But anyone with that setup likely wouldn't force users to use their personal device, because they know how problematic that is.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Some bosses should be told "No".

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Don’t worry there actively working on making outlook as functional as the alternatives.

The “new version” appears like the browser version in a wrapper. So many features are just missing, like pinning a shared mailbox to your favorites.

[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The bullshit of hiding access to previously available features (i.e. editing distribution lists in the client version), to force migration is just evil, IMO.

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They just had their first major overhaul in the last decade+ and are looking pretty shiny:

https://blog.thunderbird.net/2023/07/our-fastest-most-beautiful-release-ever-thunderbird-115-supernova-is-here/

Personally I haven't had a chance to check it out because I just use my browser for personal email & my work mail is hosted through Microsoft so there's no pretending not using Outlook at work does anything for me.

That said, I am eagerly waiting for them to give the same treatment to the soon-to-be merged Thunderbird & K9 mail so I can use that for my personal mail on my phone

[–] ares35@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

i have some clients using thunderbird. i scrambled to get prepared for the onslaught of phone calls when theirs got auto-updated to the new ui. all for naught. didn't get a single call from anyone getting 'lost'. they did a good job with the refresh.

[–] Akuchimoya@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The newest release is visually awful. It drove me crazy and I had to downgrade back to the last stable (102). The content density was wildly inconsistent and text would be squished in one area and really spaced out in another. The toolbar moved so action buttons were in the title bar area, away from where your mouse would be (compared to before) if you're interacting with your inbox.

Other than that, the old version works just fine. Multiple email accounts, calendar and contacts. It does the job. Minor nitpicks, like dark mode doesn't dark evwrything, you still have to manually change your reading window colours. But at least it's once and done.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

I'm finding it to be very slow too. I move messages from my Gmail inbox to folders on Gmail with it, and it used to take a second or two with occasional slowdowns, but now it almost always takes 5 -10 seconds. Everything seems slower.

[–] ParanoiaComplex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The UI is customizable so you can increase or decrease the density of text. I personally like my text dense, but the important thing is that it's a simple settings option to change.

I also love the new layout, but I think with any UI refresh, there will be people who would hate it even if it was just objectively better.

Thunderbird's current state is the best it's ever been

[–] Akuchimoya@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

The problem is the inconsistency. The new UI has it so that the inbox is way more dense than the folders, no matter which density level you choosem

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Fantastic! I just wish they would get the Android version released sooner. Although FairEmail is awesome too!

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I switched from outlook when MS announced the new plan for outlook and honestly it's been great.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If workspaces want to facilitate industrial espionage, who am I to complain!?