this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1469 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

71083 readers
3769 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quicky@lemm.ee 209 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Agree this is bullshit, but at least there’s a Reject All button which is far more than we probably would have got prior to the introduction of GDPR.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 185 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I went on a site the other day, and a massive popup appeared before I could do anything.

"We Respect Your Privacy"

1200+ "data partners".

Big blue "Accept" button.

Yeah, no you don't.

[–] AWittyUsername@lemmy.world 70 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"We value your privacy... At about $10,000"

[–] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

More like $0,02

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

Big brown 'Eat 💩' button

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 118 points 2 years ago (1 children)

766 third parties

Facebook: look what they need to mimic a fraction of my power

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Facebook: "All third parties"

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"How many third parties?"

"Yes."

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 16 points 2 years ago

You know any third parties? Could you give them this copy of your data, thanks.

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 68 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Outlook also sends all your email, including those from other accounts, to their cloud. No questions asked. Oh, also your password, because why not?

https://cybernews.com/privacy/new-outlook-copies-user-emails-to-microsoft-cloud/

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 32 points 2 years ago

Mails, passwords, calendars and contacts. Basically everything. Here's another blog article: https://mailbox.org/en/post/warning-new-outlook-sends-passwords-mails-and-other-data-to-microsoft

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can't even turn autosave on for Word docs anymore without letting Microsoft save your shit to the cloud.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tibert@jlai.lu 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sending the entire email content to their cloud isn't that good.

However an advantage to doing so is to be able to use push notifications on the app without having to poll continuously the email address from the device. Which in return reduces the battery usage compared to constant polling.

However, they could have done something like spark mail, only get the email subject, sender and a little bit of the content to put into the noficiation then delete after the push notificdation has been sent.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] elias_griffin@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago

Also, it's the language scam of the decade to have a [privacy] agreement or terms with a "third party" which is basically anonymous/anyone/indeterminate/changing/.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 56 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Literally who would knowingly accept that

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 83 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I've been a software developer for nearly 25 years now, and I can tell you this.

No cunt reads anything.

Something pops up over the top of what they want, they'll click OK.

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 24 points 2 years ago

With dark patterns you can "guide" the user to click a particular button, for example by having "accept" in a large, bright stand out colored button, and the "reject" button in a low contrast, small or disabled looking button.

This will not prevent people from clicking reject, but it shifts the percentage of people clicking accept vs reject in the websites favor.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 years ago

As the spouse of an inpatient person who doesn’t like tech, you’re completely correct.

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I am just a guy who knows shit about computers and family knows it.

The amount of stuff I had to remove after people next next next'd an adware installation agreement during installing other stuff...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Being as I'm forced to use outlook for work... At least it's just my work persona they are tracking and selling? That guy is wild.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 years ago

They'll write "you're welcome" on your bathroom mirror when they track that you're in the shower.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 39 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At least there's a "Reject all" button.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 65 points 2 years ago (5 children)

God can you imagine.

768 collapsed areas for each one. You have to expand that area and click the small slider with a 3 second UI freeze each time you do.

Then at the end when you click apply, you get a spinning wheel with "Applying your choices" that seems like it has timed out.

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 30 points 2 years ago

Of course I can imagine, I ve used windows for thirty years now.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is pretty much fandom

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 0x2d@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 years ago (14 children)

lol, glad i switched from outlook to protonmail

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (4 children)

All MS software should be considered spyware.

It's just a shame that Outlook doesn't really have an alternative with the same level of functionality (not without spending a while adding on a bunch of add-ons anyway), and many workplaces (including mine) enforce use of Outlook and other MS software.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Honestly don't mind when workplaces enforce X or Y. It's not like any of my personal stuff goes on the work equipment anyway, nor is work stuff going on my personal equipment.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Don’t worry there actively working on making outlook as functional as the alternatives.

The “new version” appears like the browser version in a wrapper. So many features are just missing, like pinning a shared mailbox to your favorites.

[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

The bullshit of hiding access to previously available features (i.e. editing distribution lists in the client version), to force migration is just evil, IMO.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (8 children)

How's Thunderbird nowadays?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Thats gross. Just no. Use thunderbird or some other FOSS email client, at least outlook is somewhat limited with its spyware BS when you get mail through IMAP

Im tired of telling windows people something they already know. Its your choice to use a completely corporate cucked operating system for your personal computing, you don't get to clutch pearls and act suprised over it being complete spyware, or whenever microsoft decides it wants to erode your user experience just a little bit more because they can.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I tried using thunderbird for work MS email, but TB seem to be in the blacklist of my company (a professional school btw).

It popped me to ask for one time permission from the administrators and I did. They answered me 'TB is not YET trustable by them'. The incident is still 'in progress' after 10 months.

Then I found Ao. Pure gold.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finestnothing@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Fun fact! If you have outlook on your phone with a work account added, chances are IT has admin access to your phone and can remotely wipe it at any time. Also means that your phone can be collected as evidence if you or the company is involved in a court case possibly related to emails

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ok I've tested this with some users that definitely do have their work emails on their private phones and I can't see what this setting is. Are you sure about this, it seems super dodgy?

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Modern way of doing it is via intune: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/mem/intune/remote-actions/devices-wipe

You can force registration of the device before they can access the environment, and you can enforce all sorts of things.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is device management and isn't something that is the default, or comes with Outlook.

A less intrusive method is application management which gives the company control to wipe the account, not the device.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just put your work apps in your Work profile.

That's exactly why Android has this function, so they can only remotely access/wipe that profile. Everything in that profile is kept segregated from the rest of the system.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] profdc9@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's a wonder how Outlook and Exchange Server are used by most companies, many of which have sensitive confidential and proprietary data. Choosing Microsoft is all about having someone to blame for your security problems, not achieving secure communications and storage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 2 years ago

That then is one third party, one fourth party, one fifth party, …, and one 768th party, amirite?

[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Oh well as long as it's their legitimate interest, then by all means!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›