this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Headphones

17 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion around all topics related to headphones and personal audio.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Two weeks ago I replaced my old Sundaras with the Ananda Stealth. They felt more comfortable and the imaging, soundstage and bass are improved noticeably, so I decided to keep them. Yesterday I listened for the first time to a IEM (EW200), which I bought for 25$ in the 11.11.

To be honest, there is not much difference in terms of detail, imaging and bass quality. Of course, the Ananda a feel fuller, airier and with more natural timber that is very noticeable when watching movies or listening to vocals, but the rest feel kinda comparable. Now I feel like I wasted 400$ with the Ananda. Did this happen to any of you when discovering IEM?

Also, now I wonder if I buy something like the Simgot EA1000 in the 200$ range if I will be blown out or if the improvement would be comparable to jumping from the Sundara to the Ananda.

I would also like to hear from you how you feel comparing IEM with open back headphones. Cheers!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neliste@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

EW200 have some impressive sound at 170Hz ish range, which makes drum snare sounds so fun to listen to.
There is improvement going from EW200 to EA1000, though I didn't spend enough time listening to it last week. It does sounds more fun at least.

I'm in the same spot too, unable to find any justification to wear open back headphone. Largely because of my i4, which have cheating form factor.
But will have sundara coming tomorrow since got nice deal in amazon for $170, I could provide more feedback later.

[–] Comprehensive-Dot352@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for the reply. I love the Sundara, and for that price it's a bargain. Even if the Ananda are superior I would not recommend them considering the money difference with the Sundara. It's like improving a 10% for twice the money. My only complaint about Sundara is the quality of the cups. After 2 years they were destroyed. I suppose it is the same with the Anandas.

[–] neliste@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm after comparing both of them, I kinda get what you mean now.
The bass texture in EW200 is pretty damn similar to sundara.
Especially after EQ-ing the simgot.

Well not because sundara is bad, but damn EW200 is impressive for the price.

Though to be fair I had to EQ all of them since I have personal issues with most FR.
This is how i EQ'd my EW200

Preamp: -6 dB
Filter 1: ON PK Fc 800 Hz Gain 1.9 dB Q 2.000
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 1350 Hz Gain -1.3 dB Q 2.000
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 1800 Hz Gain 2.5 dB Q 5.000
Filter 4: ON HS Fc 2600 Hz Gain -4.0 dB Q 1.000
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 2500 Hz Gain -3.0 dB Q 2.000
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 10000 Hz Gain 4.0 dB Q 3.000
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 8000 Hz Gain -2.0 dB Q 4.000
Filter 8: ON PK Fc 14000 Hz Gain 3.0 dB Q 6.000
Filter 9: ON PK Fc 13000 Hz Gain -2.0 dB Q 6.000

Gonna give it more time though, this is just short impression.
But then I already know that there's no place for sundara considering I have i4, just at $170 I can always just resell it later at same / higher price. So It's risk free.

Thanks for the EQ settings, I'll take a look. Probably I am also going to get the EA1000. I will be sharing my impressions.

Sundaras for 170$ is a steal. I compared them to other cans like HD660S and AKG k712 pro and for me they sounded the best.