this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

15 readers
1 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dassads@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lavine doesn't even make sense for the Lakers, they need Caruso.(like every other team in the NBA)

[–] Ct2kKB24@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Another non offensive player? Lakers issue is no scoring. They go on 5 minute long droughts every quarter because they have no scoring threats or shot creators. Then lebron has to try and score 16 in the fourth just to make the game close

[–] Rare-Joke@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Which is exactly why they want Lavine 😂. Westbrook vibes all over again.

[–] Top-Consequence-911@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't seen one reliable report that the Lakers want LaVine

[–] Persianx6@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lavine has the Lakers on his trade destinations, might be his agent getting teams to give the Bulls a good deal.

[–] Top-Consequence-911@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Happens every year with some player or another. They even pulled the same move with LaVine to get him his bloated extension.

[–] velphegor666@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Most of the reports regret letting caruso walk. They want caruso over lavine.

[–] Awanderingleaf@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Lavine is better than Westbrook was when they brought in Westbrook but I still wouldn't do it because depth is the Lakers biggest issue and that would become an even bigger problem with Lavine.

[–] Dildozer_69@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Where did you see that we want Lavine? Have you seen literally any report stating that? Or are you assuming that every player with a trade request is a target for the lakers?

[–] KUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUZ@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s the bulls posturing. We don’t want lavine

[–] porkchop487@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Good because we don’t want Reaves. Don’t know why the Bulls would even consider this. Lavine>>>Reaves