this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

12 readers
2 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dassads@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Lavine doesn't even make sense for the Lakers, they need Caruso.(like every other team in the NBA)

[–] Ct2kKB24@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Another non offensive player? Lakers issue is no scoring. They go on 5 minute long droughts every quarter because they have no scoring threats or shot creators. Then lebron has to try and score 16 in the fourth just to make the game close

[–] Rare-Joke@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Which is exactly why they want Lavine 😂. Westbrook vibes all over again.

[–] Top-Consequence-911@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I haven't seen one reliable report that the Lakers want LaVine

[–] Persianx6@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lavine has the Lakers on his trade destinations, might be his agent getting teams to give the Bulls a good deal.

[–] Top-Consequence-911@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Happens every year with some player or another. They even pulled the same move with LaVine to get him his bloated extension.

[–] velphegor666@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Most of the reports regret letting caruso walk. They want caruso over lavine.

[–] Awanderingleaf@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Lavine is better than Westbrook was when they brought in Westbrook but I still wouldn't do it because depth is the Lakers biggest issue and that would become an even bigger problem with Lavine.

[–] Dildozer_69@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Where did you see that we want Lavine? Have you seen literally any report stating that? Or are you assuming that every player with a trade request is a target for the lakers?

[–] KUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUZ@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s the bulls posturing. We don’t want lavine

[–] porkchop487@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Good because we don’t want Reaves. Don’t know why the Bulls would even consider this. Lavine>>>Reaves