this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
767 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37720 readers
526 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I held off on Windows 10 for as long as I could until Adobe, and therefore my job, required it. Now this nonsense. I hope this isn't the start of them joining on the web DRM bandwagon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] preciouspupp@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

How would that be an antitrust issue?

[–] TokyoMonsterTrucker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Google forcing people to use its browser or pushing companies to develop exclusively for its browsers has broad antitrust implications, especially if they are using their ad clout to push wider adoption.

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s far more likely that Adobe is just being lazy/cheap in not supporting a browser with a small market share.

Yeah, to be clear, I think Google should be the target of multiple antitrust actions. This is just a symptom.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)