this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
42 points (90.4% liked)

News

23296 readers
4356 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SCB@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Gaza was already occupied. Step outside your thought pattern and consider what I'm actually saying.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Which further makes my point.

An occupied territory with partisan violence gets more occupation, which gets more partisan violence.

Do you work for an occupying force, because that's the only way occupation makes sense.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

No I just didn't bring my personal emotions and biases into this discussion. One merits alone, you have to have a plan for after this war, and "our bad, we're leaving" is the worst of those options.

That's why I said

This war has already happened. You can’t un-fuck a chicken. If there was no war, then I think you’d have a lot more ground to stand on here.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

No I just didn't bring my personal emotions.

Projection

"our bad, we're leaving" is the worst of those options.

Occupation is not going to solve this issue either.

Lets wind the clock back to The Troubles. There wasn't a military solution, it was a diplomatic one.

Funny how partisan violence died down real quick when Sinn Fein was invited to the table in good faith.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lets wind the clock back to The Troubles. There wasn’t a military solution, it was a diplomatic one

Can't do this while terrorists govern and removing terrorists from governance is literally what this war is.

The Gazan conflict is a substantially more complicated problem than the Troubles.

Insults don't work on me.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Insults don't work on me.

Wheres the insult?

The IRA are a terrorist organisation, Sinn Fein was the political party that had deniability. There was terrorism happening in while the negotiations for the situation they are in now were happening.

I'm not saying negotiate with Hamas, but I am saying increasing the military presence there while restricting more freedoms is the wrong thing to do as is evidenced by history.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Sinn Fein was the political party that had deniability.

This is the difference. Hamas is literally founded on the genocide of Israel, and as the government of Gaza, the sole political party. When their position is vacated, if the prevailing opinion of Gazans has not changed (and the time since the Oct 7 massacres has definitely not helped that) you'll just get a different terror org running the show.

I am saying increasing the military presence there while restricting more freedoms is the wrong thing to do as is evidenced by history.

They have to help rebuild or they will be in a worse position. Sometimes, as a leader, you have no good choices and must pick a least bad choice.

Even saying this, I think we both know Israel will fuck up that last part. Their leadership sucks and they'll do a bad job and round and round we'll go. That's why this situation sucks so much.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

We both know that Israel's rebuilding plans means more Palestinian displacement.

And this is a bad situation of the IDF's making.

Military occupation isn't the answer. And at this point there are no good answers as Palestine has been forced into a failed state by Israel.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

We both know that Israel’s rebuilding plans means more Palestinian displacement.

I very strongly disagree with this statement, based on past two-state offerings by Israel.

And at this point there are no good answers as Palestine has been forced into a failed state by Israel.

Here we agree tho. We are discussing which shit sandwich is most palatable.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

I very strongly disagree with this statement, based on past two-state offerings by Israel.

As if Israel hasn't consistently taken land through settler occupation for decades.

[–] VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social 2 points 11 months ago

Israel hasn't actually wanted a two state solution since Rabin. They pretend to offer it then withdraw it the second something goes wrong, which they goad into happening on purpose by doing things like continuing increasing West Bank occupations while negotiating, or propping up Hamas to do a terrorism while negotiating, so they have an excuse to stop negotiations.