this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
140 points (97.9% liked)

Work Reform

10006 readers
7 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MHLoppy2@aussie.zone 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

In this experiment, external funding is paying for the handouts.

In a self-contained system, the same system/community providing the handouts would be generating the revenue for them (e.g., via taxation). Think of existing social welfare where "the system" generates the revenue that pays for the welfare programs.

[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 3 points 11 months ago

Ah, that makes sense. Thanks for taking the time to explain.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's irrelevant to the question here. Here the question is how would people live their lives depending on the variation of the UBI. They still pay taxes. It's no different than government money.

The question you are asking is where the money will come from. Or how will the government finance this. It's not a difficult question to solve, except for liberals who hate taxes more than anything else on earth.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The question of where to get the money is not so simple, really. Especially so if the economy is already fubar

[–] Garbanzo@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

You know money is just made up, right? The question of where to get the money is the simplest part of the whole proposition.