this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
287 points (94.2% liked)

Sync for Lemmy

15143 readers
5 users here now

๐Ÿ‘€


Welcome to Sync for Lemmy!

Download Sync for Lemmy


Welcome to the official Sync for Lemmy community.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Community Rules


1- No advertising or spam.

All types of advertising and spam are restricted in this community.



Community Credits

Artwork and community banner by: @MargotRobbie@lemmy.world


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Please note this is just a beta and there are going to be bugs, but it works and it works nicely. Have fun.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Oddbin@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

My excitement is tempered by two things, the ultra cost being a subscription (I get the "why" I just hate more subscriptions) and also the pretty crappy targeted adverts "consent" whereby you have to scroll through page after page of third party vendors to turn off the "legitimate" interest which is, let's be honest their way around consent by just ignoring what you want. That's put me right off in all honesty sorry.

[โ€“] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Man, when the Pro lifetime comes out I'm there but at this point I'm not going to engage at all with either being tracked by advertisers or being forced to go through all that. There are other open source apps that don't do any of that which may not be quite as good but the difference is worth it. Lemmy doesn't have any ads. Why should I subject myself to ads or being tracked to use what is already free?

[โ€“] Amir@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

If you use dns.adguard.com you won't have any ads.

[โ€“] gpopides@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because you know what sync provides and why it's worth spending money on it. I get these arguments and they are valid but no one forces anyone to use an app. You can just ignore it. I also prefer open source apps and don't like subscriptions but I bought the Ultra even if I just want to remove the ads. Also the price is not that big so i think of it as a donation.

[โ€“] Dettweiler42@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's a nice app, but so is Jerboa, which does not have ads. If there was a one-time ad-free purchase; I would strongly consider it; but I'm not going to pay a subscription to avoid ads on an already ad-free website.

[โ€“] Distributed@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I'm sticking with voyager/memmy

[โ€“] deweydecibel@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is also the dev that got really hurt over his paying customers not liking when he completely changed the app they paid for under their nose with no option to roll back, and quit pushing updates for a while after that. It was a whole thing.

I'm not paying a dev that can't handle feedback and has an entire fanclub cheering on literally every single decision.

[โ€“] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe the developer is working on a one-time payment Pro version that removes ads. Ultra has additional features for a subscription fee.

[โ€“] Dettweiler42@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's out now. $20. No thanks.

[โ€“] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

It's amazing how many cookie consent banners aren't compliant. There has to be a button where you can clearly reject all, where it has equal look and feel as accept all. By default all non required cookies must be disabled, but the fact we can turn off the legitimate interest options shows they're not required, and so they're not compliant.

Basically every banner should have a reject button that's just as clear as the accept. I'd you're going through any extra effort to reject then it's not compliant.

[โ€“] theragu40@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Then there's me, who actively went hunting for where I could pay for this app as soon as I opened it

This dev has never been anything but respectful of his community. I have no qualms paying him the equivalent of 2 beers a year for something I have used for multiple hours a day every day for more than a decade. Easy value proposition.

The targeted ads thing I guess I get, but I haven't had ads on Sync for so long it honestly didn't really phase me because I planned to buy ad free anyway. Hopefully that bit gets streamlined.

[โ€“] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for pointing that out. Big no for me. I shuddered when I saw Facebook mentioned there.

[โ€“] A2PKXG@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a service, why should you pay once? It's like water and electricity, ongoing cost needs to be balanced by ongoing revenue. Especially when the utility is also ongoing.

If you prefer paying once, get some dividend ETFs and use the dividends to pay for the service. Yes, it's expensive, but you can also sell the etf again when you stop using the service.

[โ€“] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One of the dumbest comments I read here.

[โ€“] A2PKXG@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago

can you enlighten me?