this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
49 points (70.9% liked)

Games

32431 readers
1044 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Just release a beta version and let the true/core fans shape the final version of game.

I'm talking to you Hello Games (No man's sky), just don't mess it up with upcoming 'Light no fire'.

Edit: Blueprint (not footprint)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bridge_too_close@kbin.social 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

A lot of devs already do this. That's what Steam Early Access is for. Now, whether or not the devs actually listen to feedback is a different story...

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Early Access is just "release". Only the devs openly admit ahead of time the game is buggy and unfinished, and promise - as always - to fix it up and add the missing parts.

Often they do. Sometimes they don't.

TBH it's ultimately nothing but a shitty buggy release, but the honesty of making that known ahead of time buys a whole lot of goodwill. It should be the default, that any publisher releasing a game that is not finished - so most AAA nowadays - marks it as Early Access, openly declaring the unfinished part.

It's also very different from a beta version, which is usually feature and content complete (otherwise it's generally called an alpha). Early Access versions are often very early in the development process, they're feature-complete-ish, but never or rarely content complete, usually just starting out on that. This works exceedingly well for games that need "just more stuff", but can miss the mark on games that need underlying systems reworked as this ires the existing playerbase and splits it.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I disagree, big publishers do not deserve early access, they have money to pay for QA, it's a gross misuse of the feature.

[–] bridge_too_close@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Early access isn't necessarily different from a beta version, it's just the name of the program used by devs to generate some revenue and get feedback during development. The game can be in alpha or beta or whatever.

Personally, I avoid games in early access on principle (with a couple exceptions) as I would rather play them once they are completed.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Same, I got little enough gaming time, might as well play it once it's in its best state and play something else before that.