Programming

17432 readers

227 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

The NSA advises move to memory-safe languages (www.nsa.gov)

submitted 11 months ago by mac@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 38 points 11 months ago (3 children)

C#, Go, Java, Python, Rust, and Swift

[–] pkill@programming.dev 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

so basically anything without manual memory management. I don't really see a good point in shilling particular names aside from discussions on performance impact of GC vs VM vs ownership

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Not really manual memory management. I'd say C++'s memory management is automatic, just not safe.

Yes, a lot of programming languages are memory safe, maybe it would be faster to list memory unsafe popular languages.

[–] BatmanAoD@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

Sorry, are you saying the NSA's information sheet shouldn't have mentioned specific languages? Why not?