this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers
109 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
9
Community is not enough (raphael.lullis.net)
submitted 1 year ago by rglullis to c/technology@beehaw.org
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

We will need small and independent commercial providers for the Fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rglullis 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Hacker News discussion that sparked this post also argued that Wikipedia was a reasonable counter-argument. My response then is the same as it is now:

  • Wikipedia has a different usage model. Content there is read a lot less than it is written and a lot more permanent. You can store all of wikipedia in a small hard disk.
  • When people make a change on Wikipedia, they are doing for their own good as well as others. Moderators on Social media are doing it solely to combat trolls and harassers.
  • Wikipedia is not a business. They are a foundation and they've used that position to do questionable things as well. (not sharing their actual revenues, no financial support for their moderators, etc)
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wikimedia is raking in millions from donations. That money could easily also finance a social media site.

[–] rglullis 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are they doing with all the money and why do they keep asking for more of it? Why don't they take some of that money to support the rest of the staff that has asked for help?

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Don't ask me... there are a lot of people asking Wikimedia the same thing. See the link below that I posted.

[–] coldblade2000@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Wikipedia is also actively used by practically anyone that has a connection to the internet, too. Something like Lemmy has way higher costs per user (both financial and computational), and a significantly smaller user base.

[–] coldblade2000@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wikipedia is also actively used by practically anyone that has a connection to the internet, too. Something like Lemmy has way higher costs per user (both financial and computational), and a significantly smaller user base.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except that the hosting costs of Wikipedia are neligible. Have a look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Guy_Macon/Wikipedia_has_Cancer

[–] coldblade2000@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

You're agreeing with me.