this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
171 points (86.4% liked)

Technology

59269 readers
4099 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kogasa@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No such thing has been "mathematically proven." The emergent behavior of ML models is their notable characteristic. The whole point is that their ability to do anything is emergent behavior.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Here's a white paper explicitly proving:

  1. No emergent properties (illusory due to bad measures)
  2. Predictable linear progress with model size

https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.15004

The field changes fast, I understand it is hard to keep up

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure, if you define "emergent abilities" just so. It's obvious from context that this is not what I described.

[–] huginn@feddit.it -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Their paper uses industry standard definitions

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

Their paper uses terminology that makes sense in context. It's not a definition of "emergent behavior."