this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
233 points (82.6% liked)
science
14726 readers
887 users here now
just science related topics. please contribute
note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry
Rule 1) Be kind.
lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about
I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sure, but my question is more like "who are you that I should trust your perspective?" Particularly when you seem to admit having a bias towards a "doomer" perspective. Like, I wouldn't want to take an article seriously when the title is "We need more police, and that's okay" from theauthoritarian.com
It eventually turns into a full on conspiracy article about how the government is faking all the covid statistics. Garbage article and website.
It's not a loaded question to ask "who are you and why should I trust you?"
Ok, Doomer
Nice.
'Editorial style' is not saying the government is faking COVID statistics. Laughable you can say 'isnt science the authority here' while dismissing blatant fear mongering and misinformation as 'editorial style', lmfao and you expect people to take you seriously
Yeah I'm laughing alright