this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
127 points (99.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54577 readers
314 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

looks like rendering adblockers extensions obsolete with manifest-v3 was not enough so now they try to implement DRM into the browser giving the ability to any website to refuse traffic to you if you don't run a complaint browser ( cough...firefox )

here is an article in hacker news since i'm sure they can explain this to you better than i.

and also some github docs

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

We need more browser options, not just Firefox and 20 versions of chrome.

[–] GordonFremen@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have the funds, donate to Mozilla. They're not only the main developers of the only major competing browser engine, but also do a lot of other good work. You can hope for others, but with Firefox only having single-digit usage share it needs all the help it can get.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

You can’t legally donate to Firefox, as it is developed by a Corp (Mozilla Corp.). Donations go to Mozilla Foundation, which does… other things with you money. In other words, your money don’t go towards FF development.

So, if you donate thinking that your money helps Firefox development, you're doing it wrong.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

To be fair, there are about 20 versions of Firefox too. It’s just that most of them aren’t there to Hoover up ad revenue.

[–] pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] chumbaz@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don’t even have builds. How can we support tools the bulk of users can’t easily implement or recommend non technical people to try?

[–] pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can support by joining the project and helping them to fix issues. It's a young project, but they've been progressing really fast. Andreas Kling is one of the original developers of Safari, and in the past years he's been creating his own operating system (Serenity OS) and formed a team who've been doing their own JavaScript engine, web browser and a programming language together with the OS. It's a really fascinating story and I give all the respect for them for doing this. This is the work we have to do if we want to beat Google from taking the internet. It's us who need to step up and start fixing the internet.

https://awesomekling.github.io/Ladybird-a-new-cross-platform-browser-project/

https://serenityos.org/

[–] chumbaz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t disagree with you on alternatives but again it’s challenging for the technical folks amongst our peer groups to help adoption of an alternative if we can’t provide places for the folks we support to download the alternative and try it

There’s no way for any of my family or friends to understand how to build their own browser, let alone setup a WSL2 environment to make it work. Their eyes are going to glaze over at the thought then they’re going to go download something else.

[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 1 points 1 year ago

Google basically made it so that it takes a large company to compete with all the """web features""" that they have, so good luck with that.