this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
341 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
3561 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/8121669

Taggart (@mttaggart) writes:

Japan determines copyright doesn't apply to LLM/ML training data.

On a global scale, Japan’s move adds a twist to the regulation debate. Current discussions have focused on a “rogue nation” scenario where a less developed country might disregard a global framework to gain an advantage. But with Japan, we see a different dynamic. The world’s third-largest economy is saying it won’t hinder AI research and development. Plus, it’s prepared to leverage this new technology to compete directly with the West.

I am going to live in the sea.

www.biia.com/japan-goes-all-in-copyright-doesnt-apply-to-ai-training/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

What's stopping somebody from making an LLM that can reproduce media that was used in its training with close to 100% accuracy? If that happens, then we'll have a copyright laundering service.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Reproducing copywrited works would be a problem. Consuming them is not.

In your example, a copyright case would be able to move forward and be tested in court. I would think it stands as good of a shot at prevailing in that example. It would be the same as a case against someone who wrote a script for a website to reproduce copyrighted work on command. The difference is this isn't that. And if and when it does that, the ai can be tuned to prevent it from continuing to do it.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hi chatgpt7, I like legend of Zelda tears of the second kingdom, please code a similar game but change the colour of the grass from light green to medium light green.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Again, that's producing a copyrighted work. That would be illegal. That isn't the same as inputting the code into the LLM to use as a reference for when someone asks for help coding movement mechanics for a 3rd person action game of their own imagination

[–] regbin_@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you make it reproduce copyrighted media, it is a problem.

As long as the stuff it generates doesn't resemble any copyrighted works, even if it was trained on copyrighted works, I don't see why that should be problem.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I don't even think there's a problem recreating it, you just can't distribute it.

For personal use it's fine.

Its not like Disney is suing everyone drawing micky mouse in their personal art workbook

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What media is an LLM going to be able to reproduce that I can't already reproduce with a copy paste?

[–] Breve@pawb.social 6 points 10 months ago

Copyright infringement is about the act of reproduction, not the tools used to reproduce it. The court effectively said the LLM itself is not illegal just like a photocopier or CD/DVD burner is not illegal. It's illegal if someone used an LLM, or photocopier, to make an unauthorized copy of a protected work though.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It will go to a judge and the judge will say that changing three pixels doesn't make it derivative. Regardless of the method of transformation, the same fair use and parody laws apply.