NotMyOldRedditName

joined 2 years ago
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I'll bet 1 internet point that they never vote anyone but republican for the rest of their lives even after this. The ones who don't get deported of course.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Smaller cells have less energy to expend if something goes wrong, making it easier to control thermal runaway.

Part of the problem with other OEM vehicles is they are using large pouch cells which are prone to being damaged by their very nature, and if something goes wrong there's significantly more energy per cell to deal with.

People don't really care about the cells in their car, but they should.

I'll never own a pouch cell vehicle. Prismatic or cylindrical only.

Edit: and the only reason people were using them years ago was there was no other options with enough supply. It wasn't because it was the right choice. Many OEMs are now moving away from them.

Ice agent threateningly approaches person holding camera yelling at them to stop recording. While waving his hands around in anger his arm touches the camera person.

Charge: Felony assault on a police officer.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (16 children)

checks post, 9h

sets VPN to UK

I support Palestine Action

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I have a lot more faith in SaskTel succeeding here than if its been given to Rogers or Bell.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

All push notifications go through APNS on apple. That's Apple Push Notifications Service.

APNS requires the device to authenticate with it and can uniquely identify the device by an id. Its how it sends messages to devices.

Firebase cloud messaging acts the same way for true push notifications.

You don't need to audit a device using APNS or FCM on Android to know that it is not anonymous.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ya, for sure. My beef was just with people saying you can roll your own, but glossing over the reduced user experience and reliability if you do.

With those trade offs it's absolutely doable and makes sense for certain situations.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ya, it can be brutal on battery.

I worked on an app once where delivery was critical, so we gave them the option of the active service+websocket, but for them the trade off was acceptable.

Pushes can be pretty flakey given all the shenanigans OEMs do on the device, even when marked as high priority correctly.

And the even worse part is when OEMs reset battery saving flags the user had set to help pushes get through and they stop working one day because of it.

Every few trips to Costco already seems too often, but it is delicious.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They don't treat their people like shit, they treat them like slaves. In countries outside China at that.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3v5n7w55kpo

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

It's actually not possible to build a push service like FCM or APNS on Android and have it function at the same level as FCM. FCM has special permissions to bypass certain device states on the device to ensure message delivery that nothing else can match.

The best you can do is approximate it with an always active websocket and a foreground service always running with battery optimizations disabled, but good luck not having that foreground service shut down on occasion as well. Devices are hostile to them for battery saving purposes. You'd have the best luck with a Pixel device though for something like that. You could also do some sort of scheduled background polling, but the device can be hostile to that as well, and it would eat more battery.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

You don't even need to audit a closed source app to know that Apple knows which devices its sending pushes to. It works because they know.

 

There's been a lot of talk about SMR's over the years, it's nice to see one finally being built.

Even if it comes in over budget, getting the first one done will be a great learning experience and could lead to figuring out how to do future ones cheaper.

Assuming it's on time, completion in 2029, connected to grid in 2030.

 

I hope everyone can now stop with all the it has no crumple zone so it's a death trap comments.

I guess that means doubling down on the pedestrian death machine now.

Full report is available from the website

Edit: Also the report is dated January 14th. This is before Trump.

 

So, the recall is more than the rear camera, there was a software/hardware combo problem that could cause the HW4 computer to short, which took out major functionality on the car without the computer.

The backup camera is part of what is lost, and is a mandatory safety feature, so the recall is technically because of that, even though it's much more than that.

What I find interesting is that this appears to be the 2nd recall where software has physically broken hardware which is a more uncommon type of recall. Lots of hardware problems that can be fixed with software, but not a lot of software problems breaking hardware.

The other one was on earlier Model 3's they were logging too much data, and they actually went through the lifespan of the memory in the vehicle. Once the memory was dead the vehicle had problems. The fix was to log less. They eventually had to address that, but it took a long time to properly acknowledge.

Tesla said a reverse current may occur while powering up the vehicle, which could cause a short circuit on the car's computer board and result in the rear-view camera becoming inoperative, the automaker said.

The automaker said the issue was the result of a sequence of specific software and hardware configurations, coupled with colder temperatures.

Tesla said it has already pushed a software update to vehicles that changes the vehicle power up sequence to prevent the shorting failure. Tesla will identify any vehicles with a circuit board issue and replace the car's computer if necessary.

The automaker launched an investigation after seeing an increase in car computer replacements relating to short circuit issues in November.

Tesla said it has 887 warranty claims and 68 field reports related to the recall but said it is not aware of any collisions, injuries or fatalities related to the condition

Tesla said Model 3, Model S and Model X vehicles in production also received a different car computer variant after Dec. 16 to address the issue.

The issue affects 2024-25 Model 3 and Model S vehicles and 2023-25 Model X and Model Y.

 

The company’s letter to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) stated the door handles could allow water to enter the circuit board assembly, which may lead to the doors opening unexpectedly.

According to Volkswagen, the production halt could last until the beginning of next year as it works to resolve the issue.

 

This was a really good interview, worth the watch!

 

It doesn't say what was changed but that makes it a great price again.

It also really messes up the pricing between the 3 RWD which doesn't qualify and the AWD that does since it's only a 1k difference now. I wonder if we'll see them lower the RWD or potentially raise the AWD price?

 

So both Rivian and Tesla have or say they are going to have range extenders for their trucks, but in both cases even if they are removable and rentable they are huge as trucks are huge. In teslas case it seems to be a permanent change though.

What about commuter cars though?

One thing we really need is cheaper in city commuters and those don't need a long range. That brings costs down and gets more people into EVs, but those will get relegated to 2nd cars in many cases.

If those commuter cars could go to a shop and get an extender added in the trunk though that would make them much more capable of longer trips as well while keeping costs down.

If the battery rental is similar or less to renting a car for the same period then people would opt to use their own car for the longer trip and all the personal comforts that provides.

The batteries would be much smaller as well for a smaller vehicle.

 

Really cool look inside the factory!

view more: next ›