this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
269 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59323 readers
4666 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

At a Senate hearing on AI’s impact on journalism, lawmakers backed media industry calls to make OpenAI and other tech companies pay to license news articles and other data used to train algorithms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aelwero@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Are they going to pay for anything that ever inspired them? Every time you publish an article, you owe a dollar to every English teacher you ever had? Fill out your taxes and you owe your math teachers?

It's fucking goofy...

[–] DrMcRobot@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's a pretty dumb comparison. Are you suggesting that people who create stuff used to train AI are obligated to provide that education for free? People who create books/educational aids for teachers to use in classrooms still demand to be paid for that. Teachers are paid for delivering that education. The kids don't pay the teachers, as a society we tax people because education benefits us all, but the teachers are still paid (not enough!)

[–] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I think he's suggesting that it's pretty dystopian to let creators decide that their content is free to view but only if you're a human willing to let companies spy on you while watching it.

It's either free or it's not.

[–] Shurimal@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Human brain (any brain, really) is a natural neural network which is trained throughout its life the same way an artificial neural network is. Nothing is original, every creator is "stealing" from every other creator who's work they have studied to become better creators. No creator ever in history has created anything in pure, absolute vaccuum. Every creation is a remix and amalgamation of previously created works.

And intellectual property is a spook , anyway. No-one can own an idea.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Human brain (any brain, really) is a natural neural network

But the big difference between us and the AI is that we have motivation and drive. We don't exist for a split second for the sole purpose of fulfilling a prompt. We can take what we've learned and create new things with it. The AI just spits out what it already knows. Not what is possible to do with what it knows. It cannot invent.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Property is a spook generally.

But I can't blame journalist's for wanting to eat.

Which is what this is really about. Food and paying the bills. Not intellectual property.

[–] txmyx@feddit.de -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The human brain isn't a product that is being sold. Also in most cases, education is not free (school, university, ...)

[–] Shurimal@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Education is free in most of the world. And people sell their brains all the time. It's called "a job".

[–] burliman@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

You’re getting downvoted, but it will be the next thing. Don’t you dare thank the people or books that inspired you when you give that Peabody acceptance speech.