this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
36 points (72.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54500 readers
614 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm looking for a way to watch recent Nebula plus videos. I only have two short videos that I am looking to watch and I don't think that justifies the cost of a subscription, though I would gladly pay 50p for each video.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 56 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Don't do them like that. This is the type of service our money should actually be going to, for now.

[–] secret_ninja@feddit.nl 15 points 10 months ago (7 children)

This. Generally speaking, If we don’t support small businesses, large corporations win and we all lose.

[–] CatTrickery@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Maybe those services shouldn't use similarly predatory models that rely on immoral subscription rather than ownership.

[–] rezz@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"You should own what you pay for" to put it another way, I think.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] Sup3rlativ3@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes those musicals and football matches I paid for when I watched them live should be mine forever...

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The experience will be, until you perish.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] Deckweiss@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Same for a video you watched...

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Think about how this would actually work. Suppose you paid some small sum for access to a piece of content.

Fairly speaking, you should only get one chance to download it or one physical copy. That's how it's traditionally been. The ability to download it multiple times (which is what happens when you stream content) is a service, and it costs a lot of money.

Streaming would therefore be pay-per-view, since you are paying for each individual copy of the data that has to be transmitted to you. It wouldn't be fair for you to just pay once and watch once and have paid the same price as someone who paid once but watched it fifty times, thereby consuming fifty times as much server power.

Most people would find it more convenient to pay a large sum upfront in exchange instead of going through the hassle of making dozens of micropayments.

In order to encourage people to make those large upfront payments, content creators would probably offer deals whereby users could get unlimited streams of their content if they commit a certain amount each month. This means their revenue is predictable and the expense is also predictable for the viewer.

Congratulations. We have invented the pricing scheme of cable television.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)