99
We’re over-freezing our food. Turning up the temperature slightly could avoid 17 Mt of CO2
(www.anthropocenemagazine.org)
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
99 points (91.6% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
7071 readers
375 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"We" as in multimillion dollar companies with 30 acre refrigeration centeres right? Since corps produce like what 70% of all emissions?
No. It’s like when toilets started getting smaller flushes. It doesn’t help on an individual basis, but as a whole it has an impact, even if it’s not a huge one.
They're probably already running at the optimum temperature. Power is their main input cost, and they're strongly motivated to minimize it. Meanwhile the average household freezer is set to... Um... how about "7". That sounds pretty cold to me, yeah?
You wouldn't believe how much research has gone into studying things like the optimum way to store potatoes.
IDK maybe something to do with the fact that they are providing a service that only runs because it's popular and used?
For what it's worth there is tons of regulation on this shit. It just doesn't say what you want it to say. Commercial energy use commonly followed a completely different rate structure.
I'd this why it takes multiple flushes to do the job these days, when my toilet at home handles it in one? Oof
"Corporation are responsible for 70% of the emissions" is how genZs defy all personal responsibility.
You all fuks are buying stuff, which is how those emissions happen. To feed your consumerism.
Stop buying refrigerated food and bam, no refrigerators will be run tomorrow.
Watch your own carbon footprint instead of constantly blaming corps. When you start consuming sustainability, the corps will follow.
Wow, full bootlicker.
Telling young people to downgrade their lifestyle without asking corporations to take accountability.
Putting shareholder value above human value.
Keep living your life like you used to, watch the planet implode, scream about corpos on in the internet to ease the pain.
In the meantime, if everyone just did that, downgraded their lifestyle, we'd all be fine.
You're talking to people that think the economy is only money made by rich people. It's not the goods they buy at the store, shipping or storing those goods. Or the industries that make trucks, trains and planes to deliver them. Just CEO profits.
The fuck did you expect?
No we wouldn't. If the biggest polluters do nothing we don't stop climate change.
And we all need shelter, food, water, and clothing. We can't stop consumption from corporations altogether.
Agriculture, construction, manufacturing, and transport are inevitable continuations. We can only do so much by voting with our wallets. We need to vote at the ballot box for regulation and laws.
Your own carbon footprint is something you can actively affect.
But sure, keep flying to 5 vacations a year, drive everywhere, eat meat for every meal, and when asked about climate change just blame dem corpos. Seems reasonable.