Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5239 readers

561 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

silence7@slrpnk.net

We’re over-freezing our food. Turning up the temperature slightly could avoid 17 Mt of CO2 (www.anthropocenemagazine.org)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by cerement@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“This temperature corresponds to 0 degrees Fahrenheit, so it was “probably a round, easy number to remember”

That’s what Allouche and team will be working on next, as they build their research summary into a full report, to be published in September 2024. “These findings give good reasons for ‘3 degrees of change’ to be further explored,” Allouche says.

Three Degrees Of Change: Frozen food in a Resilient and Sustainable Food System (PDF)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works -10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"Corporation are responsible for 70% of the emissions" is how genZs defy all personal responsibility.

You all fuks are buying stuff, which is how those emissions happen. To feed your consumerism.

Stop buying refrigerated food and bam, no refrigerators will be run tomorrow.

Watch your own carbon footprint instead of constantly blaming corps. When you start consuming sustainability, the corps will follow.

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wow, full bootlicker.

Telling young people to downgrade their lifestyle without asking corporations to take accountability.

Putting shareholder value above human value.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Keep living your life like you used to, watch the planet implode, scream about corpos on in the internet to ease the pain.

In the meantime, if everyone just did that, downgraded their lifestyle, we'd all be fine.

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No we wouldn't. If the biggest polluters do nothing we don't stop climate change.

And we all need shelter, food, water, and clothing. We can't stop consumption from corporations altogether.

Agriculture, construction, manufacturing, and transport are inevitable continuations. We can only do so much by voting with our wallets. We need to vote at the ballot box for regulation and laws.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

You're talking to people that think the economy is only money made by rich people. It's not the goods they buy at the store, shipping or storing those goods. Or the industries that make trucks, trains and planes to deliver them. Just CEO profits.

The fuck did you expect?

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“carbon footprint” was invented by corps specifically to shift blame away from them onto consumer shoulders
“consuming sustainably” only works when corps aren’t actively promoting artificial scarcity and manufactured demand
- where “consuming sustainably” does work is for your own peace of mind

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Your own carbon footprint is something you can actively affect.

But sure, keep flying to 5 vacations a year, drive everywhere, eat meat for every meal, and when asked about climate change just blame dem corpos. Seems reasonable.