this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
57 points (89.0% liked)
Personal Finance
4855 readers
12 users here now
Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!
Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The only thing around me that's less than 100k are parking spots...
It’s weird, I didn’t say I found those prices in your town. In MY town a 60s palace is ~ 100k and a middle class home as described by the author is 400k
My point is that what is called a middle class home has slid way the fuck up market since the salad days of the 1960s.
You said they're small and cheap. Small is right, but the household income needed to afford the fixer upper is nearly twice the average household income in my city.
Not sure why you are getting down voted. It's true, house size has inflated significantly, and it drives cost. My first home was built in the 1970s and was 1500 sqft, bought for $136k in 2017 (Zestimate is about $200k now). My current one is about 3000 sqft and it's stupidly big, but it's what was available that's not a total fixer upper.
I saw an article in WaPo the other day about house size and affordability, with one couple having a baby on the way and deciding not to move despite "needing" more space. Their house was crammed to the gills with stuff. So. Much. Stuff. I think removal of a lot of the stuff would help free up living space (so did the WaPo commenters).
I just cleaned out my apartment and wow just the old shoes that were trash were taking up so much space.