nieceandtows

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 37 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

KOreader has been a godsend on my daughter's kindle. Even has screen time features

Are you 3d printing parts?

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 26 points 4 days ago (10 children)

Useless board. Unless anchored to a specific date, there's no way to know if an actual time traveler shows up.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think back in 2021 blue iris was more mature and well supported, with a better camera compatibility. May be things have changed now with frigate?

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Sure why not? Not like they respect them anyway. If all my spec driven development experience and all the news of AI deleting production stuff then apologizing because it was explicitly instructed not to do so, asimov's laws will do a whole lot of nothing.

yeah we have some deer in the woods nearby, so it's always nice to see them in the camera, although it classifies them as dogs always lol

it's an old 1050, not very valuable. It still fits my purpose, but pretty useless other than that I think.

interesting. There's probably a ton of useful stuff for people who know what they are.

Yes, but still better for $35 than what I had before though.

This is GTX1050 and has 2gb ram. Not the best card, but for my blue iris running computer (hp elitedesk g2 i7 6700k and 32gb ram), this is the card that I can run without any extra power supply requirements. Blue iris has AI built in, and if you tell it to use a gpu to perform those ai analysis of objects (person detected, vehicle detected, animal detected, etc). It'll make the work faster and more accurate.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That happens too, you need to tweak the confidence settings. Sometimes there's nothing you can do except physical changes though.

 
 
 
 
 

31
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by nieceandtows@programming.dev to c/gardening@lemmy.world
 

 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/51247328

I use speckit, and while I like the spec/clarify/plan/task/analyze/implement loop (although it can get a bit overwhelming at times), I don't like that I have to start with writing a spec and implement it to begin with. I am looking for a more of a design phase before the spec phase, where I can talk about the overall application architecture, and then start writing specs for implementing pieces of it.

For instance, let's say I want to build a github repo provisioner that 1. creates repos with desired setup, and 2. bulk edit repos with secret updates, yaml updates, etc. I don't want to build both the features at the beginning. I want to first build only the create portion, and then do the bulk edit feature later on. With speckit, I can do this by only telling it to create the spec for the build portion, but later if I want to build the bulk edit portion, the whole application might need to be changed in important places, because it wasn't a 'planned' feature when it was first designed. I want instead to have a design phase where I describe and maintain a doc with the whole application, and when I start the spec for the create portion, the agent can understand that this create portion is only part of a bigger application and can design/implement the create portion accordingly.

Have you come across a situation like this? how do you handle your big applications? Please advise.

 

I use speckit, and while I like the spec/clarify/plan/task/analyze/implement loop (although it can get a bit overwhelming at times), I don't like that I have to start with writing a spec and implement it to begin with. I am looking for a more of a design phase before the spec phase, where I can talk about the overall application architecture, and then start writing specs for implementing pieces of it.

For instance, let's say I want to build a github repo provisioner that 1. creates repos with desired setup, and 2. bulk edit repos with secret updates, yaml updates, etc. I don't want to build both the features at the beginning. I want to first build only the create portion, and then do the bulk edit feature later on. With speckit, I can do this by only telling it to create the spec for the build portion, but later if I want to build the bulk edit portion, the whole application might need to be changed in important places, because it wasn't a 'planned' feature when it was first designed. I want instead to have a design phase where I describe and maintain a doc with the whole application, and when I start the spec for the create portion, the agent can understand that this create portion is only part of a bigger application and can design/implement the create portion accordingly.

Have you come across a situation like this? how do you handle your big applications? Please advise.

 
view more: next ›