nieceandtows

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Saved the owner's life, but at what cost??

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's been running on caddy + duckdns for 5 years or more now. I use a non standard jellyfin port for the port forwarding, so that probably helps. Also, there's probably an aspect of security by obscurity.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I set up a free dns from duckdns.org and pointed it to my jellyfin server. All my parents had to do was to use that https://randomserver.duckdns.org/ as the server url in the jellyfin app.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

Wow, this is really interesting! Thanks for the insights, and the write up!

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

Basically what happened with Claude Opus 4.8

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, that's why Google made an exclusivity deal with wikipedia instead of reddit to train their ai for any organic user level reviews/discussions on anything.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

Appreciate the insights. In all my years as a programmer, I was never the tdd kind of guy, and looks like it has now come to bite me in the ass. I need to learn how to write tests and validate/write my own tests to the code. I'm still pretty new to all this, so I'm yet to be in a position to face the long term consequences

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

Not stopping coding altogether, but if I use AI the right way, then I can keep up my velocity while also taking time for manual programming projects alongside.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

Good for you. Yeah skill atrophy is a real concern, and I'm afraid no matter how much I try to avoid it, there's a real and significant chance of that happening. I could look at it as similar to forgetting the syntaxes because I can look them up, but I think it's a lot more serious than that.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

That would work if there is such a thing as justice in this world. The reality is that companies don't give a shit, and you'll be jobless clutching to your ideals. My compromise is that ok I'll use AI and deliver stuff for you, but I'll only do it in a way that benefits me as well. I won't lose my identity as a python developer to use your ai.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's an interesting approach! I'll look into moth, thank you!

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Glad to know there is somebody else sharing my feelings on this. Even with ai critical comments, there's still some great comments here. I cross posted this to experienced_devs and there a bunch of useful comments there as well.

 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/51247328

I use speckit, and while I like the spec/clarify/plan/task/analyze/implement loop (although it can get a bit overwhelming at times), I don't like that I have to start with writing a spec and implement it to begin with. I am looking for a more of a design phase before the spec phase, where I can talk about the overall application architecture, and then start writing specs for implementing pieces of it.

For instance, let's say I want to build a github repo provisioner that 1. creates repos with desired setup, and 2. bulk edit repos with secret updates, yaml updates, etc. I don't want to build both the features at the beginning. I want to first build only the create portion, and then do the bulk edit feature later on. With speckit, I can do this by only telling it to create the spec for the build portion, but later if I want to build the bulk edit portion, the whole application might need to be changed in important places, because it wasn't a 'planned' feature when it was first designed. I want instead to have a design phase where I describe and maintain a doc with the whole application, and when I start the spec for the create portion, the agent can understand that this create portion is only part of a bigger application and can design/implement the create portion accordingly.

Have you come across a situation like this? how do you handle your big applications? Please advise.

 

I use speckit, and while I like the spec/clarify/plan/task/analyze/implement loop (although it can get a bit overwhelming at times), I don't like that I have to start with writing a spec and implement it to begin with. I am looking for a more of a design phase before the spec phase, where I can talk about the overall application architecture, and then start writing specs for implementing pieces of it.

For instance, let's say I want to build a github repo provisioner that 1. creates repos with desired setup, and 2. bulk edit repos with secret updates, yaml updates, etc. I don't want to build both the features at the beginning. I want to first build only the create portion, and then do the bulk edit feature later on. With speckit, I can do this by only telling it to create the spec for the build portion, but later if I want to build the bulk edit portion, the whole application might need to be changed in important places, because it wasn't a 'planned' feature when it was first designed. I want instead to have a design phase where I describe and maintain a doc with the whole application, and when I start the spec for the create portion, the agent can understand that this create portion is only part of a bigger application and can design/implement the create portion accordingly.

Have you come across a situation like this? how do you handle your big applications? Please advise.

 
 

Keeps alerting me to empty boxes of 'person' detected with 90+% confidence. So frustrated right now.

 

She's an only child, and we didn't grow up in America, so she's a bit naive on a lot of things. Her teacher advised us the other day that she's such a sweet girl, but middle school could be brutal for her because of that. What are some wholesome shows I can watch with her that helps her get ready for the world?

EDIT:

This is an astounding collection of shows. Thank you so much! We've started watching Amphibia, and really enjoying it so far. I'll add all these to the backlog. Thanks again!

 

FWIW

 

Designing a simple photo frame. I wanted to make it so that it prints without supports. While printing, however, the back support part wobbles/vibrates with movement, and is printing terribly.

Ender 3v3 CoreXZ, PolyTerra matte black filament, using the CR-PLA Matte profile in Creality Print 7. Tried printing at slow speeds, the issue still persists.

I've tried making the back support with only 45 degree angles (previously it was an x diagonal), made it thicker (from 0.75mm to 1.5mm). Nothing is working. Please find the stl and 3mf here (https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:7281179).

Is this a printer issue, a model issue, or a slicer issue? Please advise.

 

 
view more: next ›