this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
234 points (91.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21378 readers
1454 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol 89 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Basically people will call really visually pleasing things within a hobby porn. Like on some places online you can find food porn, which is simply really delicious looking food that's nicely presented( Yes it's kinda an edgy joke to call it porn).

    But it's not made to be sexual and no one except maybe 0000000000.1% of people( I don't want to think about it) probably get turned on by it.

    Anyway back to riceing DWM and st.

    [–] Prok@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I think you meant to put that decimal a bit further left....

    [–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 88 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Sorry, yes: 0000000000.10000000000%

    [–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    Thanks, it makes more sense now.

    [–] Zoot@reddthat.com -3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    What? Its the same as .1%, or. 01? .00000000001 would be what you'd want no?

    [–] hangonasecond@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)
    [–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

    Yeah it was a joke.

    [–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

    I doubt it, looks like a mistake. It's ok to make mistakes, even when they are funny

    [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

    It's a joke, but when exposing a number the number of left digits transmit the confidence you have in your number. 0.1 tells you that the "real" number is 0.1a, where 0 <= a < 5. 0.10000000000 is giving you a lot more information than 0.1

    [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

    Very neat! Thank you for that little tidbit.

    [–] AE5NE@lemmy.radio 1 points 10 months ago

    Surely you mean 0.0999999931082% ?

    [–] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

    No, they did not

    [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 26 points 10 months ago

    0000000000.1% = 0.1%

    [–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 3 points 10 months ago

    Now I'm thinking of all the poor people who like neatly laid out documents but can't find what they want when looking for visually pleasing layout techniques.

    [–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 3 points 10 months ago

    Now I'm thinking of all the poor people who like neatly laid out documents but can't find what they want when looking for visually pleasing layout techniques.

    [–] kurumin@linux.community -4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    and why Unix? Linux ain't unix.

    [–] wiikifox@pawb.social 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    It's not just GNU/Linux what people show in unixporn: some rice macOS, some rice BSD, and some even rice Android. What do they have in common? They're all based on UNIX.

    [–] callyral@pawb.social 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    They’re all based on UNIX.

    technically not, rather, they're unix-like since unix was a proprietary system

    [–] wiikifox@pawb.social 5 points 10 months ago

    Thanks for the heads up! I meant in philosphy, not necesarily in the code.

    [–] kurumin@linux.community 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Ohhh I only ever saw linux, sorry. So BSD is based on Unix but is not unix too?

    Thanks for explaining.

    [–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)
    [–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

    Unix is like franchising: you can be perfectly SUS, yet no money = not Unix

    [–] neidu2@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

    Depends on what you mean by BSD.

    If you mean literally BSD, then yes, it's a direct UNIX decendant based on the same source tree. However, it's been discontinued 30 years ago.

    If you mean one of the *BSDs (Freebsd, netbsd, openbsd), then the relationship is more similar to that of linux, although there is still actual BSD code involved.

    Source: Former FreeBSD user.

    [–] kurumin@linux.community 1 points 10 months ago

    oh I get it. Thanks|!|

    [–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 3 points 10 months ago

    Linux (and Android) are not based on Unix, they are Unix-like. And macOS is based on BSD.

    [–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

    X doesn't care what the kernel is.