Selfhosted

59939 readers

642 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam.
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

Help me get started with VPN (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

TLDR: VPN-newbie wants to learn how to set up and use VPN.

What I have:

Currently, many of my selfhosted services are publicly available via my domain name. I am aware that it is safer to keep things closed, and use VPN to access -- but I don't know how that works.

domain name mapped via Cloudflare > static WAN IP > ISP modem > Ubiquity USG3 gateway > Linux server and Raspberry Pi.
80,443 fowarded to Nginx Proxy Manager; everything else closed.
Linux server running Docker and several containers: NPM, Portainer, Paperless, Gitea, Mattermost, Immich, etc.
Raspberry Pi running Pi-hole as DNS server for LAN clients.
Synology NAS as network storage.

What I want:

access services from WAN via Android phone.
access services from WAN via laptop.
maybe still keep some things public?
noob-friendly solution: needs to be easy to "grok" and easy to maintain when services change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] stown@sedd.it 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you're going to do that you may as well cut out the extra server/service and run regular wireguard.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not quite, it's still much more useful because you can connect multiple devices, have users, and relay when some devices can't see each other, among other features.

[–] stown@sedd.it 1 points 2 years ago

You can do all of those things with wireguard as well... I'm not seeing any benefit to running Tailscale/headscale.