science

14812 readers

136 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

Joleee@lemmy.world

147

Slight male navigational advantage likely due to cultural differences, researchers find (phys.org)

submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A team of psychologists, social scientists, philosophers and evolutionary researchers affiliated with multiple institutions in the U.S. has found evidence suggesting that the slight advantage males have in navigation ability is likely due to differences in the ways male and female children are raised.

In their paper published in the journal Royal Society Open Science, the group describes how they studied navigational skills in multiple species to find out if there might be an evolutionary basis for one gender or the other having better skills.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 64 points 10 months ago (20 children)

I swear almost everything in gender differences comes down to how people are raised. Parents gender train kids and that shit sticks.

[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (15 children)

That is scientifically untrue. Male and female have very different biology, this is why diseases have different distribution, and drugs different effects. Biological differences are the vast majority, and can be easily studied statistically

There are also cultural differences. But saying that most or all differences are cultural is pretty dangerous.

Edit. Corrected wrong edit

[–] bouh@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Your comment is mostly wrong. There are differences in biology, but it comes down to Y chromosome basically. Most differences are cultural.

Cultural differences lead to huge differences in the observable statistics. That's the mistake you make in your comment: observable statistics can't make the difference between a cultural or biological origin for anything. Because behaviour (and this culture) will immensely affect the biology. Like doing sport or washing your hands or diet or whatever.

[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately it is not, yours however is uninformed. One doesn't measure genetics in meters of DNA. The difference between chimps and humans is just 1% of genome, and their difference are not mostly cultural because they have almost identical DNA. Genetics is so complex that changes in a single gene can have enormous difference in the physiology of a system.

There are a lot of misconception about genetics and males/females differences, such that their differences are almost all cultural. Mainly because people confuse sexes and genders

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

And this is completely beside the point.

I was talking about your assertion about statistics. It's complete bullshit because statistics don't differentiate between biology and culture by themselves.

Hopefully this shorter version is easier to understand.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (12 replies)

load more comments (16 replies)