this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
399 points (99.0% liked)

News

23284 readers
3871 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 86 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Border control is literally federal jurisdiction. It's weird that they didn't just say that.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 57 points 9 months ago (6 children)

5-4 vote, I wonder what the four's reasoning was.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

Dumbass dickheads is the reason.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago

Partisanship. pure and simple.

the five voted- appropriately- as the supremacy clause has already answered the question.

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

"Fuck brown people", probably.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're expecting conservatives to be consistent in their reasoning?

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago

They're extremely consistent in their actual reasons. It's their stated reasons that vary depending on their political needs.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just read the decision form the court below.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No one provided any explantion for their vote.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

This story is about the Supreme Court's en banc decision on the application for certiorari, on appeal from the court below which I believe was the Fifth Circuit. The Fifth Circuit tossed the district court's order finding in favor of Texas. The denial of certiorari is the explanation, it means they agree with the reasoning and analysis of the Fifth Circuit. It's very rare for a denial of certiorari to have any commentary.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ohhh the lower court. "Court below" kind of threw me.

Still, the SCOTUS vote on cert was 5-4 against. Four of them voted for cert, and while that was not the thing I was initially asking about, I do wonder about why they did.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

They are partisan hacks.

[–] Coach@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Toxic masculinity?