this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
43 points (83.1% liked)

Fediverse

17741 readers
60 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
43
Lemmy Needs to Fix Its Community Separation Problem (popcar.bearblog.dev)
submitted 10 months ago by popcar2@programming.dev to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/8955176

I made a blog post on my biggest issue in Lemmy and the proposed solutions for it. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.

The irony of crossposting this is not lost on me

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Die4Ever@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Defederation messes with this though, we need more ways to control the content without relying on defederation

It makes me feel like I should be making the post to multiple communities, but then I feel like I'm spamming

[โ€“] kevincox@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yes, I agree with this. I wrote a blog post about this a while ago. post lemmy discussion.

TL;DR communities on Lemmy are federated and highly dependent on the instance that they live on. If the source instance gets banned or goes offline the community will effectively go offline too.

This can be compared to Matrix rooms which don't really live on any specific instance and continue even if the source instance goes offline. Defederation will prevent users from seeing posts from users on the blocked instance, but the room itself isn't affected.

However I feel that trying to solve this by supporting some form of community merging would likely just be papering over the problem. The only way to really solve this is by properly decentralizing communities.