163
TED Fellows Resign Over ‘Genocide Apologist’ Bill Ackman’s Speaker Invite
(www.thedailybeast.com)
this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
163 points (98.2% liked)
News
23301 readers
3735 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What do you call when a country's foreign minister, among other high ranking politicians, calls for the expulsion of an ethnicity from their lands, while his country is using the Article II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide as a TODO list?
The Israeli government is not even keeping the part that is supposed to be quiet out of the government's mouths let alone actually quite.
I didn't know you get your comments removed by mods if you say "it's not a genocide" and they label as misinformation lmfao.
It's just not. Nobody thinks that outside of Africa's league of corrupted nations. I'll agree that this is misinformation when the non Arabic countries sending Palestine foreign aid consider it genocide. When you can get Justin Trudeau to say it's a genocide then I'll change my mind.
Why Justin Trudeau?
Would you prefer Biden? Macron? Scholz? They all don't call it a genocide. Who is calling it a genocide? The Arab league signed up to call it a genocide as a whole but does al-Sisi even call it a genocide? Does the king of Saudi call it a genocide?
Most world leaders also don't call the Armenian genocide, genocide despite the fact the word was coined to describe it, and you have plenty of examples of genocide after WW2 that were tolerated by the international community. International politics are not a good court, because governments by their own nature tend to focus on what's expedient for the national interests and not in what's right.
Edit: I just remembered a particularly nasty one, remember when the western world and China decided to support the Khmer Rouge and the Cambodian Genocide (and before you go full denialist on this one, it was classified as such by an international court).
I don’t have a preference. I was, and still am, just curious why Justin Trudeau?
Now I am also why you listed all the others you listed as well?
Idunno maybe because they are leaders of major countries involved. I listed Trudeau as a notable left leaning western leader who does not agree with this agenda.
Why is South Africa championing a genocide ICJ case for Palestinians?
Because they went through apartheid and are sensitive to oppressive, violent, and racist governments.
No idea, I haven’t really paid attention to the case.
Well the ICJ just decided that there's a case against Israel, so, despite your racist rant, it's not just Africa that thinks that Israel actions might fall under the definition of genocide.
Sorry you are right I shouldn't have said Africa's corrupted nations. I should have said BRICS and other axis of evil nation states instead.
But anyways, nobody gives a flying fuck about any ruling coming from the ICJ especially if the EU is not backing it.