Technology

59427 readers

2839 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

505

Victory! Ring Announces It Will No Longer Facilitate Police Requests for Footage from Users | EFF (www.eff.org)

submitted 9 months ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/technology@lemmy.world

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

In a way the sketchy off brand seems like a better idea in that case, at least there's not some monolithic entity holding millions of feeds to ask for access to

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I still remember watching unsecured cameras through a site I’d feel uncomfortable posting. All five minutes of it was eye opening. As an aside, more external security cameras are connected to the internet than I had originally thought.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Oh I'm sure browsing through something like shodan.io would give a bunch of open feeds. Some are intentional, a lot are mistakes, bringing their presence to light is a net good though in alerting both the public and potentially the owner to fix their gear.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

…indeed.

That’s a flip flop and a bed. The 360 controls work. Wish I could contact the owner, assuming they’re not running a social experiment.

[–] littlewonder@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Under-the-bed monsters running a honeypot.

[–] morriscox@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If it's the site that I'm thinking of, they don't support HTTPS.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

It was shodan. Given that the site was already posted, I’m fine with confirming that they do not support https.

[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

But you don't have to go sketchy off brand. You can get Ubiquiti if you want a really good system, or eufy or reolink if you don't want to muck about with the sysadmin stuff Ubiquiti requires

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, plenty of options out there. I have a couple cheap Chinese type that aren't plugged in on any regular basis. Neat thing is that the accounts are basically by serial number if I recall from back when I set it up, so with them off my trusted net and the data fed put through a VPN to home base they're functionally ghost cams without a location attached.

Plus they can record to local SD, so if the server goes offline in the future they can work like a dashcam at least.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You can figure out approximate longitude and latitude using shadow angles and time of day/year.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, but if someone is going to that much effort to track down your feed (assuming it was outdoors to start with) then you're probably under investigation for something.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

I've setup a Ubiquiti system. There are two things to know:

For the cost of local storage, you are going to spend several years worth of subscription fees
The login is still controlled by Ubiquiti's cloud system, which has had its own problems in the recent past

Now, I think those are acceptable tradeoffs, but I think we should be clear about its limitations.