this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
489 points (98.4% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3202 readers
2 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Sunshine@lemmy.ca
Ceres@lemmy.world
489
Despite the bad press, half of America is still considering an EV or hybrid car — they just want them to be cheaper (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/evs@lemmy.world
146 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Claims that electric vehicles don't have enough demand may be overblown.

A new study from GBK Collective, published Thursday, found that half of the more than 2,000 US car consumers they interviewed were considering either an electric or a hybrid car for their next vehicle purchase.

This far outweighs the current ownership trends found in the study. Only 14% of those surveyed already own a plug-in or hybrid vehicle of some kind. It's another piece of evidence of a huge opportunity for EV manufacturers to home in on the needs of these green car-curious consumers.

"These are not the same kind of customers who created the initial EV market," GBK President Jeremy Korst told Business Insider in an interview.

…

"These are later adopters, and because of that, they're not as driven by innovation or even design," Korst said. "They have more functional needs, and they're much more pragmatic and thinking about the total cost of ownership both in price and in effort, like, 'how do I charge so what's that going to take? How much time is it going to take me?'"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

2002 called. They want their stereotypes back.

China caught up on developing and producing quality products themselves, while many western companies lacked innovation and just payed out dividends instead of investing into the future.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I agree their capability has increased a lot, but i seems to me like most stuff I buy thats made in China is designed to fail.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah they caught up, they didn’t get ahead.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

They make a lot of stuff in general. Chances are if you're looking at the label for country of origin it's not because it's working fine.

In general, they sell a lot of stuff that breaks fast because they have a lower price floor, so if you want to make cheap garbage, you can pay less for it in China.
If you want something perfectly decent, it's still cheaper because of the balance of trade, but it's not as drastic.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That can be the case for some products. It should not get us to relax in hubris until it is too late to stay in competition.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I'm not sure outsourcing so much manufacturing to a powerful, authoritarian state was such a good idea. T

Then again, the transnational corporations making the decisions only care about their investors. Supporting human rights and democratic countries was never important to them.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

China can lick my nuts