Science Fiction

13602 readers

2 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

'Foundation' Is Fixing The Trickiest Thing About the Asimov Books (www.inverse.com)

submitted 1 year ago by RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.ninja to c/sciencefiction@lemmy.world

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The title comes from the article, but I agree with some of these changes. It's making for an engaging show that also feels modern.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] QubaXR@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I could not make it past the first season. It's all looks and no content. They drag out unnecessary bits, mess up the narrative of the original material to make it more "tv friendly".

I'd put it on the same shelf as Amazon's "The Expanse". If you like that, maybe foundation is also your cup of tea. Personally I'm not into either.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I liked The Expanse and still hate Foundarion.