this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
23 points (87.1% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3202 readers
2 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (7 children)

I'm confused. They said the Model S Plaid got 329 miles last year and implied it was the overall winner. Yet it's not even on the list this year?

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 7 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Because it's from last year and not this year. And as they write at the beginning, they can't compare between years, as the weather isn't the same

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Ok, so how many miles did it get this year?

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Seems they didn't test the plaid this year, probably because they tested the new ones and not test every EV, every year again?
Have you even read the article, where they explain why this isn't comparable to last year?

Although would be nice to know, if batteries got better and with that to include last years winner as a reference

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Yes, I read the article. They crowned a "surprising champion". But since they don't bother testing last year's champion, it's quite possible the real champion hasn't changed. Of course, reporting "same champion as last year" is not a surprise and doesn't get as many readers.

For someone who actually wants the EV with the best winter range this article is useless at best, clickbait at worst.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's almost like it would be hard to test every single product on the market every year, so since they tested one sample of the market last year maybe this year they should test a different sample?

It's not like the Model S has changed much since last year. If you are actually shopping for a car, then you have all of the information you need.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

I don't want them to test every single car every year. But if they are going to test some cars twice in a row - and they did - then one of those cars should be the best one from last year. Especially since they explicitly pointed out that results from last year cannot be compared to those from this year.

If they fail to test the previous champion, then their claim of a "new champion" is meaningless.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, would have liked to see at least last years champ as well in the comparison, with a newly done test

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)