this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
655 points (98.4% liked)

News

38185 readers
2559 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He signed an executive order on Thursday, saying violence had reached "intolerable levels".

The sanctions will block the individuals from accessing all US property and other assets.

Violence in the West Bank has spiked since Hamas's 7 October attack on Israel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just to clarify, until the suspension of funding, the US was giving aid.

Just not to the Palestinian government. It is illegal for a president to give aid directly to a terrorist state.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Lmaololololololol.

UNRWA couldn't get any aid into Gaza. The IDF has been blocking them. Talking about payments to buy food is useless if the food cannot be delivered.

GTFO here with the third deliberately stupid take I've seen you publish today.

[–] bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We can agree that the Palestininian's need food absolutely.

But blocking an organization.after that organization was involved in.a terror attack seems a bit obvious doesn't it?

But let me guess, it's also Israel's fault that UNRWA allowed themselves to be infiltrated, isn't it?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We cut off UNRWA at the mere accusation they had some employees that were involved, not leadership or the organization at large.

But we continue to support Israel through what amounts to hundreds of credible accusations and statements by their leadership showing this is on purpose.

Make that make sense.