this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
396 points (93.0% liked)

News

22903 readers
4584 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Ethereum transitioned from PoW to Pos.
What's not to like about that?

[–] hark@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That those with more have more control. It's a reinvention of fiat currency. PoW also had that problem since people with more money could afford better mining hardware, but PoS is even more direct. That's not even getting into tether printing and other bullshit. The claim is that cryptocurrency is a move away from our existing financial system, but the reality is that it's just another arm of it.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

How would you construct a consensus in which contributors don't have a stake in the game?
How would it work and based on what incentive?
Why would they stay honest? Because as soon as there's any stake in play, those with money will be able to get more of it.
I'm honestly curious and interested in viable alternatives.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

it is now provably not secure. Because pos is provably not objective. Making the whole thing moot. Also, it is literally a system explicitly designed around "the rich get richer".

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Security is relative - always!
Can you name one consensus scheme that isn't?

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

proof of work is objective. It sucks for other reasons, but I do not need to trust anyone to start participating.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Even if it is (I don't see your reasoning explaining that) that doesn't mean the resulting security scheme is objective.

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Isn’t ethereum a centralised shit coin with a money printer attached, controlled by the owners of the “foundation?”

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

In what way is Ethereum centralized?
The owers of ETH contribute to the consensus.
How would the foundation control any of that?
Mybe you confuse Ethereum with IOTA?