this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
310 points (86.6% liked)

Privacy

31278 readers
610 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt text: an ad for Github Copilot when viewing files in a github repo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 65 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)
  1. it's not intrusive
  2. it can be dismissed in one click, and this hides these ads everywhere and permanently
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 63 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah... And microtransactions in videogames used to be "just cosmetic". /s

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nah, no /s needed when there are actual ample examples of enshittification via nickel and diming ads and ad-like bwhavior.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not sure what you think "/s" means, but what it means is that the comment was sarcastic, which it was.

[–] Deckweiss@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

But in this case, the meaning stays the same even without the /s, because the key message is factually true and the sentence still functions as a contra to the previous comment.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

/s never changes the meaning. Its just a disclosure.

[–] Deckweiss@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It doesn't change the intended meaning but it can change the interpreted one.

For example when I write "I love to give my data to Google /s" you can be sure that I actually do not love to give my data to Google, whereas leaving out the '/s' I could have meant it sincerely (for example, because I want targeted ads, perfectly tailored to my needs).

This example clearly illustrates the totally opposite interpreted meaning.

But in the case of the comment we are discussing, disclosing the sarcasm makes no difference to either side of the conversation (the sender and the readers)

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

I thnkI wrote /s, because "just cosmetic" is already a lie.

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Someone needs to turn the hyperbole dial down on Lemmy. My feed is frequently nothing but Chicken Little's whining about trivial shit. When something truly egregious comes up, I'm not going to be able to see if in a sea of outrage.

[–] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 4 points 7 months ago

Privacy, FOSS, leftists -- all of these communities have a very large presence here, and while I love all of them, they do tend to love their purity tests. Purity tests have been a constant in these communities for as long as I can remember them existing. Lemmy just has a high concentration of 'em.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago
[–] Restaldt@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Please drink verification can to push