this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
643 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59596 readers
3431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House wants to 'cryptographically verify' videos of Joe Biden so viewers don't mistake them for AI deepfakes::Biden's AI advisor Ben Buchanan said a method of clearly verifying White House releases is "in the works."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Very few people understand why a GPG signature is reliable or how to check it. Malicious actors will add a "GPG Signed" watermark to their fake videos and call it a day, and 90% of victims will believe it.

[–] optissima@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

As soon as VLC adds the gpg sig feature, it's over.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

No, it's not. People don't use VLC to watch misinformation videos. They see it on Reddit, Facebook, YouTube, or TikTok.

[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

…how popular do you think VLC is among those who don’t understand cryptographic signatures?

[–] TheKingBee@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

And that will in no way be the first step on the road to VLC deciding which videos it allows you to play...

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah but all it takes is proving it doesn't have the right signature and you can make the Social Media corpo take every piece of media with that signature just for that alone.

What's even better is that you can attack entities that try to maliciously let people get away with misusing their look and fake being signed for failing to defend their IP, basically declaring you intend to take them to court to Public Domainify literally everything that makes them any money at all.

If billionaires were willing to allow disinformation as a service then they wouldn't have gone to war against news as a service to make it profitable to begin with.