this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
310 points (87.3% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2667 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Translation: business-types are salty about Wikipedia not toeing the line on the fiction that executive pay "needs" to be obscene in order to "attract talent."

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I still think the "low" salary of Wikimedia is obscene.

There is no way even that figure is proportionate to what these people actually do day to day.

[–] Blackhole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

700k? For being in charge of one of the biggest websites in history?

That doesn't seem awful at all.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

They don't like it when real life counters their narrative, and this shows that corporations can pay reasonable salaries to their executives.