this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
378 points (97.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9628 readers
804 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KGB@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

Why aren’t there more underground or at multilevel parking available instead of the expensive real estate used as parking lots anyway? Surely it’s more efficient is it not?

Genuinely curious here.

[–] demonhockey@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Garages are expensive to build and if you design your roads so that no person with the means would choose anything but driving and ignore the rest, then sprawl becomes the reasonable choice, since people are driving to every destination anyway. What's the point of the added expense of a garage if you don't really care about being close to other things nearby?

[–] KGB@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean it could free up more space for apartments and other mixed use buildings in the area. Gives a chance for the walkability in the area too, if executed well.

[–] Magiccupcake@startrek.website 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes but that's socialist.

And goes against my donors paycheck.

/s but many people in charge are willfully ignorant that society can be built in a way that doesn't rely on cars.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago
[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In addition to what others have said, parking lots are also an easy and cheap way to keep vacant land for speculative purposes.

Basically, our current property tax system allows you to buy a vacant lot, sit on it for a number of years while paying pennies in taxes (because a vacant lot or a parking lot is very low value, even if the land is very high value), and then resell for a much higher price after the city has grown around it. Basically no work, but tons of free profit.

The remedy? Tax land instead. That way, your tax burden is based on the value of your land, not the value of your improvements, so that this form of land speculation becomes uneconomical, while also strongly incentivizing you to develop something more valuable, e.g., housing, offices, etc.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

There is a guy near where I live that I think does this. One of the lots has a tiny restaurant on it that I'm like 95% sure is a front, with a huge parking lot. They've bought a few lots nearby and do by the month parking permits. The whole area is being turned into apartments so it feels like he's just sitting on them for the right offer.

[–] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Not much underground because Houston is basically a swamp.

Nothing up high because why do that when there’s a whole bunch of flat ground?

Never mind the lack of public transport, bike infrastructure, or the general fact that literally everything is built way to far apart to make walking an option…

[–] KGB@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Welp, thanks for the info.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Houston is built on a swamp so you can't really dig a lot without dealing with humidity, water, etc. Multilevel means investment and debt. It can take many years to break even. You can make $25/hr per space and quickly make profit and sell in 10 years for 10 times what you paid for. There are multi level parking though.

Basically, it's greed.

[–] KGB@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It’s always greed…

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

One reason is it is millions of dollars more expensive to build underground parking.

I think I’ve seen examples where the underground parking for a commercial building costs as much as or more than the building above.

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

There is underground parking in downtown Houston as well, but during heavy rain they flood like crazy. I want to say the underground garage near the theatre district was closed for a few months after Harvey.