this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
66 points (91.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40719 readers
395 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
66
Anybody here running AD on-prem in your homelab? (lemmy.world)
submitted 10 months ago by MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm curious as to why someone would need to do that short of having a bunch of users and a small office at home. Or maybe managing the family's computers is easier that way?

I was considering a domain controller (biased towards linux since most servers/VMs are linux) but right now, for the homelab, it just seems like a shiny new toy to play with rather than something that can make life easier/more secure. There's also the problem of HA and being locked out of your computer if the DC is down.

Tell me why you're running it and the setup you've got that makes having a DC worth it.

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Godort@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I agree that for this size of network AD is definitely not something you want to deal with unless you want to learn how it works.

However, I'm not sure it really increases attack vectors to have it running, outside of the fact that it's a new network service on the LAN. The out of the box default configuration is not bad these days, security-wise

[–] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The attack vectors I'm thinking of just come from the inherent complexity and centralization. I'm just considering the amount of damage that can be done with a compromised DA account for example vs a non directory environment.

It's complicated. Done right it can be more secure, not done right it's less secure.

I also only get brought in for problems for the last however many years, so I'm probaby a bit biased at this point haha.

I have had to tell companies they are going to have to rebuild thier AD from scratch because they didn't know what thier DSRM password was (usually after a ransomware attack). These are the sort of hassles I think about vs non AD.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

For the rest of us: DSRM

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I'll keep that in mind, thank you