this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
268 points (98.6% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
310 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jake Moffatt was booking a flight to Toronto and asked the bot about the airline's bereavement rates – reduced fares provided in the event someone needs to travel due to the death of an immediate family member.

Moffatt said he was told that these fares could be claimed retroactively by completing a refund application within 90 days of the date the ticket was issued, and submitted a screenshot of his conversation with the bot as evidence supporting this claim.

The airline refused the refund because it said its policy was that bereavement fare could not, in fact, be claimed retroactively.

Air Canada argued that it could not be held liable for information provided by the bot.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] jasep@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Chatbot = basically free

Yearly employee = probably about $100k incl benefits

Should they hire a person? Absolutely. Will they if they can get away with it? Aww hell naw.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

You are pretty optimistic they would pay $100k for this job. It is probs far less, which makes this even worse, they are not saving that much money really.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

It costs your employer about 30% more to employ you than what you earn (approximately) - so hiring someone for 75k will usually cost a company somewhere around 100k.

[–] jasep@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I didn't say they would pay $100k. I said it would cost probably $100k including benefits - a full time employee cost isn't just their salary or hourly wage. There's lots of overhead cost to employ a person at a large company. Also keep in mind this is for a Canadian, so don't be thinking in USD. In CAD in the Toronto area (for example), it isn't unreasonable to think even a first line phone based customer service agent salary would be between $65-70k, then the employee expenses on top of that.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

LOL customer service agents do NOT get paid $65-70k

[–] jasep@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Well, you're just wrong about that. I worked for a company that employed front of the line customer service in Toronto that paid $80k...in 2017! I'm not saying Air Canada does (I have no idea what AC wages are), but if their agents are part of a union, it's definitely possible.

But my point stands - if anyone thinks these companies are going to 'do the right thing' and hire real people when these AI chatbots exist and are so cheap, it's just not going to happen.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It’s probably half that, but a chatbot can serve thousands of users whereas an employee can manage a few at a time.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

Confirmed. As someone who has led customer operations at large companies, the scale of chatbots to address a userbase is absurd. Companies are more than willing to take the hit to their reputation and customer goodwill in exchange for not needing to hire as much staff, train them, manage their schedules or deal with benefits and performance reviews. Cutting all that cost is an instaboner to execs and a nightmare to support managers who actually care about quality.

The amount of $700 judgements that Air Canada would need to be hit with to make replacing humans with chatbots a losing proposition is too high. It'll never happen.

Sadly, in my decade of experience, I've yet to see any bots able to reliably handle much beyond 'where's my order?'.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I want to see who will buy the garbage they are selling when no one has money.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

Doesn't matter to their shareholders. They'll have already made their money.