this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
215 points (99.1% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2114 readers
70 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Djinn@lemm.ee
215
Linda Hamilton says she wouldn't star in a 'Terminator' reboot: 'It's been done to death' (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 9 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/moviesandtv@lemm.ee
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Vengefu1Tuna@lemm.ee 43 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's because it's safer from an investor perspective. A reboot of a successful movie and continuations in established series have more predictable revenue than an original story, which is why originals have become more rare. It all comes down to money.

[โ€“] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 10 points 9 months ago

But on the flip side, we are starting to see movies getting funded on the A24 model of making cheaper movies so you can role the dice on more ideas. That isn't even a new idea; Eisner used the "singles and doubles" strategy when he went to Disney as a way to rebuild the company's finances.

And it seems like now is the time to take risks.