Gaming

30566 readers

199 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

Whom@beehaw.org

The_Hunted_One@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

chloyster@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

134

Why Baldur’s Gate III is an accidental PS5 console exclusive (www.engadget.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/gaming@beehaw.org

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Larian is having trouble fitting Baldur’s Gate III on the Xbox Series S, the lower-priced and lower-powered console in Microsoft’s ninth-generation lineup.

I was looking up more information on why there’s such an issue getting BG3 on Xbox, and found this article with a lot more detail on the topic.

EDIT: The issue isn’t graphics or frame rate; it’s memory. The article goes into detail.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The article says they're not allowed, legally, to do that, and the ball is on Microsoft's yard.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

they are not allowed to have one good version and a crippled version. they absolutely are legally allowed to just cripple both. "but the ps5 will have split screen!" well then, sucks to be you if you bought an xbox. think microsoft for that, sony consoles have nothing to do with it. or microsoft could just admit to themselves that expecting a next-gen game to run equally well on literally-worse-than-last-gen hardware is just a pipe dream.

[–] astrionic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As far as I can tell the article only talks about a feature parity requirement between the Xbox Series S and Series X versions. And that could be met by just dropping the feature from both versions.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They may or may not have the requirement anymore, but they definitely used to have this parity clause as well. Then if it came to other platforms first and Xbox later, the Xbox version had to have bonus content beyond the original release.

[–] astrionic@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also thought they might have such a requirement but I was unable to find a source that confirms (or even mentions) it. Definitely still possible though.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I remember it coming up on podcasts back during the 360 era, so that was long enough ago that things may have changed.