this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
138 points (97.9% liked)

CanadaPolitics

1873 readers
3 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules:

All of Lemmy.ca's rules apply

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 41 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I have kids, I don't want them watching porn too young, but at the same time I'm not stupid enough to think that age blocking major websites is going to keep them out of it at all. This is nothing but theater, and it's an invasion of privacy while they're acting.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The only way to stop teenagers from watching porn is....

Uhh I don't think there's a way.

Conservatives are on a big kick for so-called "parental rights" but what about parental responsibilities? It's a parent's job to make sure their children have a healthy relationship with sexuality.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Back in my day you could find porn in the woods. You'll never stop teenagers finding porn.

If all the major sites comply with the proposed law, all it means is that teenagers will be pushed to more sketchy sites that don't have restrictions. This combined with conservatives destroying sex ed is not good for anyone.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Oh wow I almost forgot about woods porn..hi fellow old person .

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

Conservatives are on a big kick for so-called "parental rights" but what about parental responsibilities?

It's always that way.

The people who scream the loudest about " muh rights" never want to acknowledge that rights come with responsibilities.

And never seem to want to demonstrate that they can act in a responsible manner.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 months ago

It's going to drive young people to less reputable porn sites with much more questionable materials.