this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
150 points (84.1% liked)

News

23287 readers
4583 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And you all told me the blue maga border bill that Republicans rejected was 4d chess.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't see immigrants and refugees as humans worth saving... because I don't equate Trump and Biden?

Or because I think committing suicide by cop is a dumbass decision?

Please, clarify.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@midwest.social 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because you think if 70% of the population believes we should dehumanize and imprison innocent people, then you're just fine with that.

YOU SAID IT, not me.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because you think if 70% of the population believes we should dehumanize and imprison innocent people, then you’re just fine with that.

I think that if 70% of the population thinks we should dehumanize and imprison innocent people, opposition is pretty clearly not a position that's going to win a majority of the vote, which is necessary to win an election. Put another way - Truman running on desegregation in the late 1940s, but not gay marriage, was completely acceptable, because there was no fucking way the majority of the population was going to vote in favor of gay marriage.

You address what problems you can with politicians - the rest, you have to change minds on the ground. You want to change this situation? Argue with your fellow citizens. Get them out of their mindset of border hysteria. But throwing a fit over how democracy works on a basic level isn't going to help anyone.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@midwest.social 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So your answer is: Yes, you would support a genocide if 70% of the population supported it.

I know enough not to try talking any sense into you. I've seen that you're nothing but a conservative status quo warrior. But I'm thankful anyone who sees this thread will be clear on what you are.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"I oppose the end of slavery without gay marriage." - LinkOpensChest_wav circa 1861

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@midwest.social 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're using the history of an appalling state founded on racism with a history of genocide that made the Nazis shudder?

Maybe don't use US history as an example of what we should look up to. It's a cautionary tale.

And we don't need to decide between freedom and LGBTQ+ rights. Any valid system would protect these things in spite of what 70% of people might be deceived into believing

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for confirming you don't believe in democracy as a means of coming to decisions.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@midwest.social 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I do believe in democracy. A democracy is not "vote for this terrible person who's less terrible than the other terrible person."

Anarchist communities have democracy, we don't

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A democracy is not “vote for this terrible person who’s less terrible than the other terrible person.”

It is if a large proportion of the voters believe in terrible positions.

Anarchist communities have democracy, we don’t

I'm curious - what happens when the anarchist community votes to exclude others from their community? Is that anarcho-fascism?

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@midwest.social 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It is if a large proportion of the voters believe in terrible positions

And you're just fine with that, so the answer to my question was "yes"

And that's... not how anarchy works. People are only excluded if they are doing something really egregiously antithetical to anarchism -- for example, attempting to introduce hierarchical structures or otherwise treat others inequitably.

Read the table of contents to find the relevant section. I understand not comprehending anarchism because anarchists too have been historically oppressed and our ideas muddied.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

And that’s… not how anarchy works.

It literally is. Acceptance into an anarchist commune has, historically, been far from guaranteed just by wandering in and saying "I would like to automatically be a full member of your commune." when there are large portions of the population which are quite opposed to the ideals you want to uphold.

People are only excluded if they are doing something really egregiously antithetical to anarchism – for example, attempting to introduce hierarchical structures or otherwise treat others inequitably.

"You see, MY democracy where we strip people of voting rights and keep them as second-class citizens for what they believe is way better than those other so-called democracies where people vote based on what they believe!"

Very democratic, 10/10. Worst part is, it both contradicts your prior point, and it's not even a particularly anarchist answer.

You don't know the least thing about anarchism. Please read.