this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
469 points (97.0% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2139 readers
5 users here now

This is a community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussion civil and on topic.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So a post-apocalyptic love story? Cuz that seemed to be the main theme. Unless you were just too caught up over the characters being gay to notice.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Offermans character was deep in the closet and his future husband had to break down some heavy emotional walls. It was his first relationship with a man.

Being gay was very much part of the theme and wasn't just some offhand detail about them imo.

There was a lot to the episode but pretending their sexuality had no impact on how the story was told or its impact is silly. I don't think it would have been as touching without it.

Some of you really need a rewatch.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You should really rewatch it, because the genders could be changed and it'd still be a good episode.

No mattrr how much people whine or gloat about it, the gayness wasn't required. It's not a "gay" story. That's the entire point Offerman is making.