Grimy

joined 1 year ago
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

The ones that are sponsored by Microsoft and Google to aid in their regulatory capture quest certainly are.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Huggingface is a huge ressource, I'm very surprised they blocked it.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd rather they give them derogatory names.

Useless_tools-1852 has a nice ring to it.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago

Schrodingers pig.

The cop shot an innocent bystander in the head but also shot another cop. Until trial, he is both a bad guy with a gun and a good guy with a gun.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A computer lacks human emotions, more at 6

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Set up the system for them and let it do the talking I guess?

They can have both until they realize they don't need both.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago

Always has been

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I make sure to always assume it was nepotism and my confidence remains sky high no matter how long I stay unemployed. It just works.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Having a phone that can turn into an iPad is probably going to get some use.

There is practical purpose to a touchscreen, the fact that short sighted people couldn't see its usefulness is my actual point.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Someone said the same about touchscreen when you were still a kid. If you don't want it, don't buy it.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What if Google was God.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I felt gross when she was talking about fracking at the debate. I thought she was going to take a harder stance and I'm quite disappointed.

75
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Grimy@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
 

Meta's issue isn't with the still-being-finalized AI Act, but rather with how it can train models using data from European customers while complying with GDPR — the EU's existing data protection law.

  • Meta announced in May that it planned to use publicly available posts from Facebook and Instagram users to train future models. Meta said it sent more than 2 billion notifications to users in the EU, offering a means for opting out, with training set to begin in June.

  • Meta says it briefed EU regulators months in advance of that public announcement and received only minimal feedback, which it says it addressed.

  • In June — after announcing its plans publicly — Meta was ordered to pause the training on EU data. A couple weeks later it received dozens of questions from data privacy regulators from across the region.

 

A bipartisan group of senators introduced a new bill to make it easier to authenticate and detect artificial intelligence-generated content and protect journalists and artists from having their work gobbled up by AI models without their permission.

The Content Origin Protection and Integrity from Edited and Deepfaked Media Act (COPIED Act) would direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to create standards and guidelines that help prove the origin of content and detect synthetic content, like through watermarking. It also directs the agency to create security measures to prevent tampering and requires AI tools for creative or journalistic content to let users attach information about their origin and prohibit that information from being removed. Under the bill, such content also could not be used to train AI models.

Content owners, including broadcasters, artists, and newspapers, could sue companies they believe used their materials without permission or tampered with authentication markers. State attorneys general and the Federal Trade Commission could also enforce the bill, which its backers say prohibits anyone from “removing, disabling, or tampering with content provenance information” outside of an exception for some security research purposes.

(A copy of the bill is in he article, here is the important part imo:

Prohibits the use of “covered content” (digital representations of copyrighted works) with content provenance to either train an AI- /algorithm-based system or create synthetic content without the express, informed consent and adherence to the terms of use of such content, including compensation)

 

I've just finished A Deepness in the Sky by Vernor Vinge. It was amazing and coincidentally my two last books where children of time(1 and 2) and (as to not spoil the reveal) a certain book involving spiders/crabs that live in high pressure environment.

I'm thoroughly enjoying the theme I have going on even if it was purely accidental, what would be some good recommendations involving sentient spider to pursue next?

view more: next ›