this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
149 points (96.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5243 readers
395 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
149
Homebuilders are fighting green building. Homeowners will pay. | Using questionable math, industry lobbyists are frustrating efforts to make new houses more efficient and compatible with clean tech (www.bloomberg.com)
submitted 8 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I genuinely wish that campaign funding via donations, PACs, Super PACs, etc was illegal. Make some campaign tax that pulls in roughly the value that these industries were dumping into bribing politicians anyway, but now evenly distribute those funds to each candidate in the running.

The industries would obviously throw hissy fits about this because they couldn't have their little puppets in congress anymore, but it'd do so much for giving government back to the people