Given the source I'm incredulous.
While corporations are out of hand greedy and trying stifling every genuine attempts with their pseudo solutions Bloomberg is also not on our side.
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
149 points (96.9% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5243 readers
367 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Not surprised. As a home builder who grew up using green building practices I have watched the industry take over code writing in CA much to the detriment of homeowners.
Product makers and industry leaders should not be writing building codes nor fighting the public on climate change but that’s what you get when you install incompetent pricks who paid for their campaign by catering to the industry to public office.
I genuinely wish that campaign funding via donations, PACs, Super PACs, etc was illegal. Make some campaign tax that pulls in roughly the value that these industries were dumping into bribing politicians anyway, but now evenly distribute those funds to each candidate in the running.
The industries would obviously throw hissy fits about this because they couldn't have their little puppets in congress anymore, but it'd do so much for giving government back to the people
Must. Destroy. Planet. Get. Money. Be big man.
What would be great would be not building single family homes at all
No thanks. I mean I'm firmly in the build more apartments crowd but I want to own my own place with a yard.
I believe the term for that is NIMBY.
I believe the term is preference. I prefer to own a home. I don't mind being neighbors with an apartment.
Yeah, no. I never want to hear my neighbor through a common wall or ceiling.
There is sound dampening to avoid that
I have never, in my life, seen an apartment or condo with that level of stc or iic rating, much less one installed correctly. The only place I’ve been in with that kind of treatment is a SCIF for TS/SCI functions and you could build a whole good damned single family house for that kind of money.
Yes! Cram everyone in apartments! People living on all sides is the dream! Who could possibly want land or space between them and neighbors!? Eliminate choice, push everyone into a box.
Um, did you forget that duplexes and town-homes exist?
Still not space or land
This, but unironically.